Social media is seen as
confusing by many. But really,
understanding the main applications is quite easy. The following was adapted from a recent presentation at the
OBA Institute 2012 session on social media* as the ultimate ‘social media
explained’. It’s truly a gem to explain
the differences in the crucial social media platforms.
Twitter: I’m eating a great cheeseburger
You Tube: Watch me eating a cheeseburger
We threw away our crystal ball long ago when we learned that experience and judgment were far more important in planning for the future than wistful thinking. So you ask – what do we see in 2012 for professional firms?
For the third year in a row I listened to in-house general counsel (“GC”) present their take on law firm providers to the Legal Marketing Association in Toronto this fall. The messages never change and it bewilders us why that is. Are you listening? Do you know what your clients think? If you do, are you addressing their issues?
We blogged recently about foreign law firms getting a toe hold in Canada when Norton Rose and Ogilvy Renault tied the knot and the opportunities for small and mid-sized firms this offered. Bay Street is abuzz as rumours that FMC and DLA Piper are merging swirl everywhere
With the Norton Rose move every law firm chair who offered an opinion was certain that this was a one-off. Media reported that none of Canada’s major firms were interested in following Ogilvey Renault down the aisle.
– It would do everything from the perspective of the end user e.g. your client. It would provide a unique and utterly simple client experience.
– Your brand image would be beautiful.
– Design and typography would play a central role. The logo, all brand assets, all ads and communications would be a delight to interact with.
– There would be no boardrooms – meetings would be conducted on sofas over coffee.
– Business would be fun and entertaining.
– Your consumer interaction would be amazingly easy.